book scanningThis is a featured page

http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2007/04/turn_your_camer.html

April 25, 2007

Turn your camera into a scanner with Snapter

Using a camera as a scanner is nothing new but it depends on how good the software is that performs the optical character recognition (OCR). Snapter is a program that has just exited a beta program that purports to be the solution for us all. To use Snapter you take a picture of a document with your camera, even phone cameras will do, and bring it into the program on your Windows-based PC. Snapter has three different "project" types to optimize the recognition depending on what you are trying to capture, document (for flat pieces of paper), card (for business cards), and book. The book project handles the curving of the pages into the spine and is used to capture text from open books. Creen_shot_snapter
Page orientation doesn't matter to Snapter, it can detect when pages are sideways for instance and handle them accordingly. What the program sets out to do is provide the equivalent of portable scanning using any phone at hand and lets the user capture those bits of information that are too important to let get away. The program is $49, kind of pricey for a single function program but the type of utility that if you need it you really need it. To use Snapter you must have the .NET Framework 2.0 installed, and they offer a 14 day fully functional free trial. To give jkOnTheRun readers a chance to give the program a good try the Snapter folks have supplied four free licenses to the program. All you need to do is leave a comment on this thread describing how Snapter could be a useful tool in your mobile toolkit and we'll pick the best four. Those lucky folks will each get the $49 program totally free so enter right now. We'll announce the winners in a day or two so don't delay. Make sure you use a valid email address with your post so we can notify you if you're a winner. UPDATE: The winners have been chosen and this contest is now closed. Thanks for participating and visiting jkOnTheRun!
Posted by James Kendrick at 6:44 AM in mobile tech | Permalink
Enjoy this post? Receive more jkOnTheRun content for FREE by subscribing to the RSS feed!

Comments

I do a bit of record paper keeping for home and my church and having a digital copy would be GREAT! I'd really enjoy using this as everything is paper at the moment.
Posted by: Micheal | April 25, 2007 at 07:25 AM
that should be paper record keeping ;)
Posted by: Micheal | April 25, 2007 at 07:26 AM
As an osteopath i have alot of paperwork from my patients eg: doctor prescription , X-rays and MRI scans. Since I do not own a scanner, this program would be great so I could load the image onto my ASUS R2H. This product would make my daily routine truely mobile.
Posted by: Neil Ingram | April 25, 2007 at 07:40 AM
This would be a godsend to me. I'm trying to build an automatic book scanner and I have to say I'm not having much success. I've almost figured out the page turning mechanism (only for one book size so far) but I'm loathe to dismantle my scanner for the next part. If I could just use my old digital camera instead that would be a lot easier.
I've tried using a camera before but the recognition on normal programs isn't good enough.
Posted by: John in Norway | April 25, 2007 at 08:00 AM
Hi James. As the Founder of Planet Ark, I'm always on the look out for newspaper articles about the environment. So many times I've read an article in a cafe and cannot take that newspaper or magazine with me as it belongs to the cafe. Having this would be very useful as it would enable me to scan and OCR that environment article 'on the run'.
Posted by: Jon Dee | April 25, 2007 at 08:03 AM
I used to use readiris for this, but results where not always that good. It all depends on how sharp your picture is. Maybe this program does a better job.
Posted by: arjaan | April 25, 2007 at 08:06 AM
Ooh! This would be so cool. I tried scanning pages with my digital camera before, but I just didn't find that it was all that readable. As a CPA, I work with tons of paper documents. I have a scanner at the office, but my Q1 is my primary computer when I'm out of the office. I'd love to have a mobile scanning solution that I can take with me to clients and for working at remote locations like the home office. Plus, I'm working on an oil and gas industry tax book and a portable scanning solution would be ideal for collecting research materials for the book. I also am a musician and I want to scan all me lead sheets into my Q1. I'd love you to pick me, but I realize that there are lots of worthy candidates. Hmm...save taxes or save the environment...maybe I'll be paying retail. LOL
Posted by: Tax Man | April 25, 2007 at 09:11 AM
Maybe I will use this for posting newspaper clippings on my blog.
Posted by: Amit Agarwal | April 25, 2007 at 09:25 AM
I scan in sketches from my sketchbook all of the time. I wonder how this program would handle in scanning drawings, and sketches. It would be nice to try.
Posted by: Michael Venini | April 25, 2007 at 10:07 AM
James,
How could the paperlessundergrad not have a copy of this? As I live away from campus right now I'm having a real problem getting a hold of critical books and articles. It's a problem that's never transpired before but as I've moved into 3rd year the shortage of books means that most of them are on short loan i.e. 4 hours max. I partly get around this in a paperless way by using the only scanner on campus but it is located in a room that's often used for training. Therefore more often than not I either have to skim read it on campus or commit the most cardinal of sins and use the photocopier..gasp!! However it wouldn't be all take take take on my part. Snapter looks like an app that's made for a paperless operative's toolbox so I'd also provide a full review of this on my own blog and as Snapter also also looks like the ideal app for the TabletPC operative i.e. scan and annotate, I can write a review article at StudentTabletPC too. Seriously if I had the $49 I'd go and buy it right now. It seems to tick so many boxes for me and gives me that warm fuzzy feeling :o)
Posted by: Robert Burdock | April 25, 2007 at 10:52 AM
I work for a smaller financial institution. The majority of employees still rely on paper. I am trying my hardest get people to change, but I still get the majority of the memo's, request, and information in paper. This software would let me quickly transfer this information to digital format. (Where I can actually do somehting with it!)
Posted by: Travis Carnahan | April 25, 2007 at 11:25 AM
I am a medical student who has to read and present past journal articles from our library. But the library copier commits highway robbery by charging us 15 cents per copy. I would love to be able to snap a picture of the article and read it on my tablet PC. The copy machine savings will allow me to buy another cup of coffee to stay up for my next 36 hour shift :)
Posted by: Kevin Y. | April 25, 2007 at 11:32 AM
As a Homebuilder, we are faced with a mountain of inspection reports, bids, and walk thru lists on our jobsites. I could see Snapter becoming an integral part of our workflow to get these inspections into our TabletPC's and onto our office network storage... Great idea! Thank you!
Posted by: Brian Schmidt | April 25, 2007 at 11:58 AM
I would use this on my Sony UX to capture flyers on post boards around town, so I could remember when events are taking place.
Posted by: Jeffery | April 25, 2007 at 12:09 PM
I'm a poor college student who would love to be able to digitize my textbooks without having to tear the spine off to run the pages through an ADF scanner to avoid the curvature effect of scanning a bound book and destroy the resale value of my textbooks at the end of the semester.
Posted by: Will | April 25, 2007 at 01:22 PM
As an IT consultant I'm on client site Mon-Thur nearly every week. On Monday mornings I get up get on a plane, live in a hotel until Thursday night and return home. There are countless opporutnities when I've wished I'd had a method to capture various articles, whiteboarding activities, and information when I'm on a plane, in the client office, and away from home when all I have is my phone. This would be an ideal solution.
Posted by: Ross Wirth | April 25, 2007 at 01:27 PM
I've got 1 job, 1 wife, and 3 kids so I'm always going from location to location regardless of the time or day. Snapter would allow me to do SO many of the mobile tasks that I now have to accomplish SO much easier from scanning library reference books (can't check 'em out) for school projects to scanning that last copy of the hockey schedule (coach didn't make enough) so someone else can have it to scanning my contacts business cards. It's a very useful piece of software. SO, please enter me into this contest! Thanks, Gene
Posted by: Gene Schmeling | April 25, 2007 at 01:37 PM
Hi - a graduate environmental journalism student here. Heading from a science masters this year into a journalism masters in August, I'll be upgrading (or downsizing) my mobile kit from a fujitsu T4020 tablet to a P1610 (for the just-whip-it-out factor for interviews and contacts) and my digital camera. I'm already trying to live a paperless lifestyle to ease the load on my long commute, but I have trouble when professors saddle me with loads of paper handouts - I end up splitting my notetaking between paper and the tablet. A program like this could solve that problem, as well as: - make researching for articles a snap (hee) with no photocopying involved - allow me to develop a really cool contacts file with photo-scanned business cards, pictures of my contacts, and onenote links to interviews and recordings - reduce the scanning-textbook stress (and soul-deep guilt at destroying books) with the continuous shooting setting on my camera - allow me to put event brochures and programs directly into my notes Thanks for the opportunity, Emily
Posted by: Emily | April 25, 2007 at 02:05 PM
I have this great big pile of stuff I call 'My Archive' where _all_ of my correspondence, receipts, pretty much everything paperized, gets stuffed into. I basically have the policy that I never look at any of it on paper, I scan it all and process it on my PC. What I would LOVE is to be able to upload photo's live from my mobile phone (or from camera to SD to web if need be), photographing my documents, sending them across the globe using UMTS and having them end up in my online document storage, all scanned and stuff.
Posted by: Michiel Trimpe | April 25, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Let me start by saying thanks for sponsoring another awesome contest! I've been using the demo of Snapster for the past few days and it rocks! I’ve been using it in conjunction with a digital camera, but I am counting down the last few days before I am eligible for a phone upgrade so I can get a smartphone with an integrated camera (using Snapster and OneNote Mobile to supplement my tablet PC and OneNote 2007—mobile productivity heaven!). I know that I could make very good use of this program at school, home, and, and work. I am starting an online MPA program from an out-of-state university, so I am going to be really dependant on the libraries at near-by colleges as I research assignments and my thesis (not to mention that I won’t have any checkout privileges). Snapster would be such a blessing in this situation—whip out the smartphone, take pictures of the materials I need, fire up Bluetooth and sync the phone with my tablet PC. I would run the pictures through Snapster to flatten them and then print them into OneNote 2007 for OCR. Fully searchable research notes without those annoying copy charges! Sweet! In fact, I am thinking about writing my thesis on the topic of how technology can aid citizens in disaster preparedness and a good case study of how folks could use a program such as Snapster in conjunction with an inexpensive digital camera to create a disaster document kit with digitized copies of records such as birth certificates, social security cards, bank records, etc. would be an excellent starting point! At home I have an antique scanner (it’s got a serial interface, for crying out loud) that’s no longer ideal for document preservation. With Snapster, I could use my smartphone or my wife’s digital camera to quickly digitize important documents. With my old Mustek scanner, it literally takes minutes to scan in one page at an absurdly low resolution. Snapster would rescue me from this situation! I could use this to digitize our records, bill stubs, receipts, and a ton of other paper documents. I could also use this in my role as our congregation’s treasurer—I could snap a picture of documents with my smartphone, file the original at the church building, and go about my merry way instead of lugging documents home to deal with them and then taking them right back for filing. This would be a huge productivity boon for me! I could use this daily at work in a multitude of ways. I visit job sites to ensure compliance with federal grant guidelines. I could snap pictures of documents from the job site with my smartphone and after flattening them with Snapster, insert them into my OneNote project support files. Again, fully OCRed documents at my fingertips! The usage scenarios are truly unlimited and I’m sure that I could find new ways to use Snapster everyday.. So good luck everyone and I’ll be waiting to see if I’m one of the lucky folks selected. Thanks again!
Posted by: Big Wes | April 25, 2007 at 03:21 PM
I'm a spy for the US goverment and everyone knows we never get any good toys...
Posted by: Northern_Rebel | April 25, 2007 at 05:39 PM
opps... forget I said that. ;-)
Posted by: Northern_Rebel | April 25, 2007 at 05:41 PM
Make it easier to carry around all my books and articles I've gotten to work on mhy thesis/Dissertation. My laptop is 5 pounds but I carry another 25-40 books with me almost everyday. Quite Frankly I'm tired of being tired before even starting to work.
Posted by: Matt Lust | April 25, 2007 at 06:22 PM
I am trying to find all of my greatgrandparents graves and what ever other evidence of their lives. Much of what I search is found in old church records, or register of deeds offices. It is very difficult to copy (xerox)some of these old records. I am using my digital camera now but this software is the missing link in the process. I need a paper record so that future family geneologists will have the reference. I have been on this search for the last 4 years. Getting close.
Posted by: Al Johnson | April 25, 2007 at 09:58 PM
My son likes to color. While "on the go" he may not have a drawing tool or anything to color. I can use this to capture an image (a picture of my dog), import it and export using the "black and white" feature in Snapter. I would then import the image in Art Rage for him to color on my tablet. This can also help cut down on replacing coloring books.
Posted by: motosync | April 25, 2007 at 11:03 PM
This software will be excellent for me to use in my current situation working with a a contested Will and surrounding Probate issue. The Wash DC Courthouse only allows you to make XEROX copies of documents, 1 page at a time at .25 per page. Then, to make it even more fun, I cannot remove the documents from the Courts Jacket/ Folder. It is both extremely cumbersome and expensive. This would be the answer to my prayers. All I will need do is sit at the cubicle and snap pictures of the required pages as fast as I can take them. This will save me hours in the future.
Thanks for a great product and giving JKOnTheRun the oppurtunity to lay it on a few readers!
Posted by: Ron P | April 26, 2007 at 12:20 AM
oh boy, you've got so many people to choose from.. poor you :P.. oh yeah, i would use it for the usual stuff.. scanning school handouts to transfer to my tablet pc .. boring huh ?
Posted by: Siddharth | April 26, 2007 at 03:21 AM
Hello, when I heard about this product i thought it would be great for my friend's daughter. She has Epidermolysis bullosa, which is a rare genetic disease characterized by the presence of extremely fragile skin and recurrent blister formation, resulting from minor mechanical friction or trauma. The skin on her hands are very fragile and her fingers are fused together. She is currently in university and is having a hard time carrying the books to school. She currently has her mom scan the books for her so that it is easier to read. We've looked into those pen scanners and other portable scanners with no luck. We want her to feel empowered. By letting her take the pictures of her books, she can feel like she's accomplishing something on her own instead of waiting for her mom to do it.
Posted by: Philip T | April 26, 2007 at 08:17 AM
I'm a Script Supervisor for film and video productions. Using a scanner to input various documents such as the script revisions handed to you at the last minute (no time to sit around with a scanner), or handwritten notes taken in conditions too extreme for the computer - just takes too long. If a camera shot could do it instantly -- Wow! That would really help!
Posted by: Mary Louise McCloskey | April 26, 2007 at 09:44 AM
Cool I've been waiting for attol just like this. Forever!
Posted by: Jocke | April 26, 2007 at 02:23 PM
Oh man this would make life easy - I am capturing family/cultural history through old hand written books and letters and I would prefer not to wreck the books or borrow the precious letters to be able to scan them.- I have used portable scans and digital camera snaps before but the results are dodgy or difficult to set up. If this works at all well, I will be able to preserve this knowledge before it is all gone forever.
Posted by: Neill Ross | April 26, 2007 at 08:02 PM
Wow, Going back to school... still having my library with me on DVD backup.. My uses would include converting my current library to digital format to allow storage of the originals,thus making for an easier move and then not worrying about extra space at school. Sweet.
Not to mention the conversion of texts and handouts.
Posted by: Scott Klein | April 27, 2007 at 12:34 AM
I am the webmaster and chief programmer/techie for DMAT CA-11, a Disaster Medical Assistance Team. We have a non-profit, 501(c)3, called Sacramento Disaster Medical Assistance Team, Inc. We have essentially zero budget for anything. All my programming is essentially a volunteer effort, using GPL and freeware, such as phpBB, mySQL, etc., to keep them in the 21rst century. I have need to do field copying, and to make instant PDF's, prints, etc. This program would REALLY help me to do this while out in the field, since I usually only have my Tablet PC and my camera, in the way of technology. Please pick me! I (and my team) will be eternally grateful!
Posted by: Renee Roberts | April 28, 2007 at 09:53 PM


http://studenttabletpc.com/2007/04/snapter_-_an_easy_way_to_turn_your_papers_digital_.html
25 April 2007Posted By: Robert
Posted in: Scanning, Software Info creen_shot_snapter.png James over at jkOntheRun highlights a new piece of software that looks ideal for student use (especially those operating paperlessly). Atiz, the company behind the Bookdrive DIY (highlighted by alcuin in our forums a couple of days ago), have released Snapter - an application that allows you to ’scan’ a document into an elecronic format using nothing more than a digital camera. I know from my point of view, and from others students I’ve spoken to, that getting handouts and articles into a digital format can be a bit of a struggle but it looks like Snapter may offer a good solution. Aziz offer a FREE 14-day fully functioning trial of Snapter but if you’re quick, and have a prizewinning idea of how you would use it, then get yourself over to jkOntheRun and let James know about it. He’s got 4 full licences to give away to the best suggestions. EDIT: Thanks for all of the comments. Looks like Snapter is building a bit of interest and no wonder, it potentially fixes a major problem. I know Tracy is going to put up some samples from her test of the trial but I’ve also had a a bit of a play and thought I’d post a couple of results for those who may be a bit wary about giving this a try. I took a fairly standard snap of an open book and here’s a screenie of the book in the app window and the results (click to expand any of the pics): snapter_book.jpg Book scan - left page Book scan - right page First impressions are good (and this picture was taken in low light). It does however seem quite important to place the book/handout etc. on a good contrasting background i.e. a darker coloured desk but that’s no big deal. I also took a purposely off-angle snap of a handout and that also converted really well indeed.

35 Responses to “Snapter - an easy way to turn your papers digital?”

  1. William Says:
    April 25th, 2007 at 5:14 pm Its much easier to carry a digital camera with you than a scanner. Looks like a good way to capture handouts.
  2. Tracy Says:
    April 25th, 2007 at 5:36 pm Wow, if this programs works on books the way it says it does, this would be an amazing program for a student. Digital cameras are a lot easier to get a hold of or borrow from friends/family if you don’t have one. For a while I “scanned” my books by picture but the downfall is it took so long to process after taking the picture. With a 5 megapixel camera, you can easily get a great picture even with taking a picture of two pages at once. This allows you to “scan” twice as fast. It also means you can scan as fast as you can snap a pic. Interesting…very interesting.
  3. Student who needs to scan textbooks Says:
    April 25th, 2007 at 5:48 pm I wish the example images were bigger…hopefully they’re not hiding something…could it be too good to be true?
  4. Tracy Says:
    April 25th, 2007 at 6:27 pm That could just be because it’s in Beta. I’ll give the demo a try in a sec.
  5. Jarred Says:
    April 25th, 2007 at 6:37 pm Hey sounds interesting. Tracy, you posted something back in 2004 under the topic “scanners” regarding using a digicam for digitizing books and one of the websites caught my eye. The before and after pictures are REMARKABLE.(all of them)I was wondering if anyone has had a chance to try the software out? Do you think it’s similar to snapter? Whiteboard Photo http://www.pixid.com/products/wbp.asp
  6. Tracy Says:
    April 25th, 2007 at 11:08 pm Those before and after pics are pretty amazing on that whiteboard site. We can only hope…
  7. Tracy Says:
    April 25th, 2007 at 11:11 pm Oh hey, cool. In small print it says the trial is fully functional after 14 days, it just leave light water marks on the pages. That would still work for student use just fine! Free for casual use! Trying it now…just installed…
  8. Tracy Says:
    April 25th, 2007 at 11:15 pm A little slow but it works pretty well. I’ll post pictures tomorrow but I need some sleep tonight.
  9. Frank Says:
    April 26th, 2007 at 8:43 am Converted page 315 to a high quality PDF. The file size went up from 402KB to 533KB. OCR performed as expected given the low contrast of the image–apprx. 60% accuracy. I see potential with a super duper fast memory card and a tripod.
  10. Matt Lust Says:
    April 26th, 2007 at 9:16 am Does increased contrast improve OCR?
  11. Robert Says:
    April 26th, 2007 at 10:13 am Nice bit of scientific work there Frank. I personally don’t see Snapter as a complete book scanning solution. I think it’s too fiddly for that and, as you’ve suggested, not particularly successful as far as OCRing goes. No I see it more as an ad hoc solution for electronically grabbing lecture handouts and snippets of books in the library instead of having to photocopy them. Oh how I wish this was available to me in first year. I think it could have saved me two years of grief :o)
  12. Frank Says:
    April 26th, 2007 at 10:56 am Matt, increased contrast will help with OCR accuracy if it darkens the text and lightens the surrounding background color. Even with black and white images adjusting the contrast gets rid of shadows and brings out the text. Robert, I thought the OCR success resulting from your image was to be expected. That’s a good thing. It means there is a good chance that a textbook with black lettering and a white background should recognize (what may seem) in a range of 90% or above. It’s never going to be perfect, but enough to highlight in Acrobat seems good to me.
  13. Chris Neff Says:
    April 28th, 2007 at 12:12 pm Hugh Sung’s review for sheet music and Snapter: http://hughsung.com/blog/index.php?itemid=747 Shame, as sheet music is still the main thing I’d like to scan. Do people still like their Optibooks?
  14. Robert Says:
    April 28th, 2007 at 12:41 pm Thanks for the link Chris. Looks like Hugh’s Snapter experience isn’t a good one :o( He’s using a 5.1 megapixel camera like I did for my test ’scans’ so he’s not inferior on resolution. Yet I’m delighted with the results. I did have a bit of ‘wacky border’ recognition but nothing to the same degree as Hugh and I was able to re-adjust the border nodes enough to recitfy mine (as Hugh acknowledges not all the border nodes are selectable. I found this a slight frustration too and the developers REALLY NEED to allow all of the nodes to be repositioned). Ultimately though there’s a world of difference I’d imagine between capturing words and capturing music but I would be interested to see if a much higher MP camera would make a difference to Hugh’s attempts. Personally I need to spend a lot more time roadtesting Snapter before I can give my absolute final opinion on it. I’ve maybe got a bit overexcited by its promising potential but when I get these couple of busy uni weeks out of the way I’ll settle down and systematically test it. If anyone else performs a full ‘roadtest’ I’d love to hear the results and your opinions (as I’m sure all of the team and a lot of our readers would) As for my Opticbook Chris it still remains a ‘cornerstone’ in my day-to-day life. As I said in a comment above Snapter would never become a complete book scanning solution for me. If I need to scan from home I would always head for the Opticbook rather than the digi camera. Snapter’s strength, in my opinion, lies in its ‘on the fly’ ability.
  15. Karla Says:
    April 29th, 2007 at 4:28 am I’m anxious to give this a try. I have loads of photographed books and journals that might be better OCR candidates if flattened out. (When those interlibrary loan books come at inconvenient times, as they always do, the digital camera is my best friend!)
  16. Matt Lust Says:
    April 29th, 2007 at 9:14 pm Anyone tried this with something as crappy as an old 3.1 MegaPixel?
  17. Tracy Says:
    April 29th, 2007 at 10:14 pm Dang-it. I would so give this a try except I lost my camera cable connector thing and I have a Sony so I have to find a memorystick adapter…
  18. Art Says:
    April 30th, 2007 at 3:57 am Greetings from Snapter team. We’ve already fixed the issues that Hugh Sung encountered. The version he reviewed was 1.03.03. Make sure you download the newest version from our web (1.03.04) at http://www.atiz.com/snapter.html
  19. Kevin Says:
    April 30th, 2007 at 8:42 am Contrary to it being the ultimate portable camera scanning solution, it might actually function best in a photoshoot setup as in their examples to get optimal results. But hopefully this program continues to develop. As digital camera’s improve so will this program.
  20. Sarasin Says:
    April 30th, 2007 at 9:03 am See new processing of Hugh Sung’s music sheets on this page using new version of Snapter (v. 1.03.04) http://www.atiz.com/test001.html
  21. Robert Says:
    April 30th, 2007 at 9:36 am @Matt - As I’m curious being I attempted using Snapter with an old 2.1 digi cam I had laying around as well. Snapter performed as it should with it. The resultant ’scan’ is usable but only just (I’d post a shot of the image but I’m on campus right now). So it would seem at least a 5 MegaPixel is a must.
  22. Kevin Says:
    April 30th, 2007 at 11:30 am If Snapter knew more information, would it be able to create more accurate images? Information such as (my main purposes is for books and not really portable scanner) page size, number of pages, book thickness, camera distance from object, etc. Maybe an advanced mode?
  23. Karla Says:
    May 1st, 2007 at 4:01 am I downloaded 1.03.04 and had exactly the same issues as Hugh Sung. I don’t know what they have improved. I tried some books (2-page spreads) with text only, and almost none of the nodes were movable, thus it wanted to do totally weird things. Also, has anyone figured out how to abandon one image and try another without having to close the program and restart???
  24. Fred Says:
    May 1st, 2007 at 10:28 am You can close an image with a right click on the input (or output) image list.
  25. Robert Says:
    May 1st, 2007 at 12:00 pm @Karla - I d/led the new version and personally found it easier to reposition the border nodes. I don’t know what to suggest other than contacting Atiz. I’ve found them to be very responsive in replying and in offering assistance
  26. Tracy Says:
    May 1st, 2007 at 4:40 pm My pages crop fine, but are then promptly turned the wrong direction and squished. I don’t have too much time right now to trouble shoot, but I’ll give it another go after Friday.
  27. Karla Says:
    May 2nd, 2007 at 1:32 am I contacted Atiz and Sarasin had me send an example of what I was working with. I sent a photo that Snapter had not done absolutely wacko things to but where it still had some trouble. The book was photographed much like what Robert’s example showed (not much black background, pretty flat but not totally flat). I grant that I had to use two fingers to hold the pages down, but in my test that wasn’t the main problem. However, Sarasin says the fingers throw everything off, the book isn’t centered well enough, the pages are too curled… Well, apart from the fingers it didn’t look that different from Robert’s sample to me. Anyhow, if Snapter can’t do this sort of thing yet, that’s that, but if they expect people to use Snapter to process books as well as totally flat objects, then they have more development to do. I hope they will, because not every book can be opened totally flat and will stay that way without being held down. Many of the books I’ve photographed have much tighter bindings than the one I used for my test. But I’ll look and see if I have anything that didn’t have to be held open/flat.
  28. Fred Says:
    May 2nd, 2007 at 2:13 am @Karla - sorry Karla i do not understand why you say that the book have to be flat, i did several tests and it works well with very curled pages…did you try the book examples images located in snapterexamples ?
  29. Karla Says:
    May 2nd, 2007 at 3:49 am Well, I’ve done more tests and sometimes it’s ok and sometimes not. Personally I thought that the whole purpose of the software was to correct curl and similar problems, but Sarasin says of my not-very-curled sample “Snapter isn’t designed to be able to magically transform every imaginable curled picture into flat nice pages.” Sarasin didn’t think the image was centered well enough, which ok it wasn’t perfectly centered but that wasn’t even the problem. I did my tests (will do some more) on photos I had already taken of books, not photos done specially for test purposes. However, I looked for samples that I thought would work well.
  30. Robert Says:
    May 2nd, 2007 at 6:22 am @Karla - I commend you for spending so much time experimenting with this. I apologise for being so bogged down that I can’t dedicate as much time on this as you have but I intend to when I’me a bit less bogged down from the middle of next week. I think as you point out this product has to develop a bit more, at least in relation to how it processes books, before it becomes truly usable. Like I’ve said I’ve used Snapter a few times ‘on the go’ now and found it truly invaluable and experienced little problem in using it. Maybe I’ve just been lucky so far. However taking into account how many digi cams there are (and their resolution capabilities), infinte differences in lighting conditions, different book types etc. etc. this must be a difficult app to get working right each and every time because of all the variables. I’m sure they will get it right though. Oh and Karla, I know you’re an Art Historian so you may be interested in a technique I developed for helping to remember artwork dates. I took a couple of semesters of Art History and really had a problem with remembering dates. It may appear to be a short cut to revision and takes away the correct study of art but quite the reverse happens. As you would know establishing the date is so important for putting art into context etc. and aside from doing that my technique also forces the student to spend a lot more time studying the work in order to implement the ‘date inserting’ technique. What’s more it’s a uber TabletPC friendly technique. I’d love to hear your opinion: http://www.paperlessundergrad.co.uk/pu/2006/02/puttingadate_.html *Sorry to go slightly off-topic guys!!
  31. Art Says:
    May 2nd, 2007 at 11:34 pm 3 rules for book scanning with Snapter: 1. snap from the center of the book 2. only one book at a time. 3. don’t put fingers on the upper/lower part of the book. Karla got problem because her picture didn’t follow rule 1 and 3. The fingers pushed on the lower part of the page blocked the view of the curve of the page. We already told on our page that fingers on the side are ok. but fingers on the bottom are not. http://www.atiz.com/howtouse_snapter.php?page=Additional
  32. Karla Says:
    May 3rd, 2007 at 1:58 am Robert, thanks for the link, I’ll be linking to it when I discuss ways for students to study efficiently. As for Snapter, I’m not interested in a debate over the qualities of my photo or whether I read their recommendations (I did). It’s obvious the software works on photos of books under very specific conditions. I never claimed my photos were ideal. I just wanted to see if Snapter would work on photos I already had, which it mostly does not. Thus, in Snapter’s CURRENT iteration, I should stick with just pulling the existing photos into Acrobat and reading them that way. I know Snapter will improve over time.
  33. adrienne Says:
    May 4th, 2007 at 5:48 am i tried it and it seems to work great for me. the modes on docs and cards are rather trouble-free and painless. As for book scanning, i first got problems too, but it made all the difference after i contacted them and then i’d follow those rules. they got good grade (at least for me) for being very responsive.
  34. Karla Says:
    May 11th, 2007 at 4:06 am OK, I’ve done more testing using book photos I already had on hand that seemed like good candidates… I wasn’t going to do photos specially for this project since that wouldn’t deal with real-life situations. It wasn’t my intention to subject the software to impossible conditions, but I had trouble finding photos that worked really well. See http://calypsospots.blogspot.com/2007/05/adventures-in-snapter-testing.html
  35. The Student Tablet PC » Blog Archives » Snapter turns sub zero Says:
    July 29th, 2007 at 7:29 am […] remember back in April that we introduced you to Snapter, a software based scanning solution that utilises a digital camera as its primary means of input? […]

http://hughsung.com/blog/index.php?itemid=747
Snapter (i wish it worked...i wish it worked...)book scanning - private notebookSnapter is a brand new program that sounds terrific in concept, but falls flat when it comes to execution. Snapter is supposed to be a document scanner that works from the images taken with your digital camera. It claims to be able to automatically correct the angle of the document and even the perspective skew. With books, it's supposed to automatically recognize the binding curve and compensate accordingly to create 'straightened' separate images for each page. Like i said, sounds terrific in concept - but before you toss out that old flatbed and shell out $49 for this snazzy-sounding program, take a look at what it did to my music:

Snapter's first attempt to recognize the border of my music and flailing badly....

The red lines are supposed to represent the border that Snapter recognizes around the document against the dark background. That lower left corner looks pretty wacky to me...and the right border isn't all that great either...

Snapter sees borders in the 5th dimension or something...

Maybe it's the fact that there are music notes and notation markings instead of predictable straight lines of text that's making Snapter draw out borders like the music comes from the 5th dimension or something...

Anyway, witness the distorted results (those of you with queasy stomachs should cover your eyes - this ain't pretty):

Snapter's Funhouse of Mirrors

I think i saw an episode of Star Trek where the transporter malfunctioned like this...

Yes, kids, like the results of a defective transporter from Star Trek, these are the sorry results.

The other frustration, i must admit, comes from the fact that my 5.1 megapixel Sony DSC-T7 does such a lousy job of capturing the music in fine enough detail for a decent scan:

I see cheese, cheese, walkin' on its knees...

With all the little blue nodes surrounding the border of Snapter's bad guesses, you'd think it'd be a simple matter to select a few and make manual adjustments, but it acts like a pit of angry asps if you try to move any of the nodes (and not all of them are selectable), skewing the borders even more horribly out of alignment.

Sigh...i really love the idea of this program, i just wish it actually worked when it comes to music...



tags: snapter, scanner, digital, image, photo, sony, DSC-T7, camera
Trackback
There are currently no trackbacks for this item.
Use this TrackBack url to ping this item (right-click, copy link target). If your blog does not support Trackbacks you can manually add your trackback by using this form.



tags: snapter, scanner, digital, image, photo, sony, DSC-T7, camera

8 comments:
I am quite disapointed that snapster has such limited capabilities. However, just like initial launch of tablet pc, I really believe snapster will come to fruition if enough efforts are put.
by: Chun Shun Lau (contact) - 28 Apr '07 - 20:54
Hi, the new version 1.03.04 has already solved this error and has much better support for books. The version reviewed was older (1.03.03). Please make sure to try the latest version.
by: Sarasin (contact) - 30 Apr '07 - 03:56
See new processing of Hugh Sung's music sheets on this page using new version of Snapter (v. 1.03.04)
http://www.atiz.com/test001...
by: Sarasin (contact) - 30 Apr '07 - 09:09
Sorry, I got much worse results than Hugh using 1:03:04 on a book that was all text and pretty much straight and clear. I didn§t expect it to be perfect, but I thought it would be easier to use and more of a real program than just an idea. I'll have to see if I have any photos of flat sheets to test, but I don't know why I'd really need anything special for those when I have Acrobat.
by: Karla (contact) - 01 May '07 - 10:27
Karla. Just send those images that u had problems with to us at snapter@atiz.com.

I'm sure we can work them out easily. Let us see and tell u why u can't the good result.

Surely, we hope it's not an idea because it is actually state-of-the-art computer vision algorithm that comes from years of Ph.D. research.
by: Sarasin (contact) - 01 May '07 - 11:07
I'm unimpressed. I had tried the 03.03 version on a jpg of a marriage certificate. The original picture show a certificate that has been folded at some stage (so does not sit flat in the image) and photographed by someone who was not directly above it. It is on the table, the photographer is obviously by the table. So the certificate is not rectangular and needs edge detection to work. Edge detection didn't work particularly well despite the black background, much as the music sheet example above.

I see the software has been up-issued to 03.04. So I download the new version to try. (I see the trial period doesn't extend from the one day left :-) but worse I still have to confirm "later" 3 separate times before it'll come in.)

Well I try the same example image. I can load it as "book" (since the shape to be detected is fairly book shaped). In this case all the nodes sit on a straight line at the top of the image, and are unmovable ?!? Or I can load as "document" in which case the 4 edges can not be adjusted to be non-straight, which messes up any accurate edge definition.

Oh, and beware of pressing to load it in as something different before changing your mind and going for the "process" button. The software may decided to have a laugh and make the "process" button inactive by the time you want to try it. Which necessitates starting again from scratch.

If you do get to process the image the result appears to be "little more" than a cropped version of the original, Certainly not the flattened version as expected. And one doesn't need additional specialist software to crop a photo,

This software has a long way to go. Personally I'd be embarrassed to release it in this form, since it does nothing to enhance the company name/brand image. It obviously has potential but there is a basic rule about applications, to do with getting them to work first.

Excuse me for not getting involved in sending on the files in question, it's not sufficiently important to me it's corrected, this post is for others' benefit, and I'm sure the problems are not something unique to my test image.
by: Gaz (contact) - 08 May '07 - 03:27
Hi Gaz - thanks so much for your input on this. I haven't gotten around to trying the updated versions, but i hope to sometime in the next few days or so...but from what i'm hearing from several folks, it looks like there still needs to be a lot of work done before this can be a reliable paper-to-digital solution. I love the idea...kind of reminds me of the early stages of PDF annotator. The first version was - to put it bluntly - flat out awful! Page turns took forever, inking was quirky, tons of bugs...the idea was great, but not ready for prime time. About 6 months or so later, i get around to trying PDF Annotator again, and suddenly it was AMAZING - blazing fast page turns, smooth inking, search capabilities...it took a while, but the end product really came out to meet the initial expectations. I just hope Snapter can follow a similar success curve as they continue to develop and fix this product...hopefully it won't take 6+ months...
by: Hugh (contact) - 08 May '07 - 10:49
I've found that it works great for flat pages, but poorly for books. Frankly though I can process loose pages faster on my old scanner with a multi-page feeder and get similar to better results. Snapter is a great idea with a poor implementation.
by: Tyler Heibeck (contact) - 31 Jan '08 - 12:19


http://calypsospots.blogspot.com/2007/05/adventures-in-snapter-testing.html

Friday, May 11, 2007

Adventures in Snapter Testing

Awhile back I read about an interesting new piece of software on The Student Tablet PC blog. Snapter is intended to straighten out photos taken of papers, business cards, and books. Since I've photographed a lot of books for my research, I was excited, especially since it looked like it was possible to get very nice results.
First, let me clarify what I do, why, and how I do it.
Many books I need in my research are relatively hard to find; they also tend to be long and/or include images I want to study. In the US, I ordered some of these via Interlibrary Loan, and while ILL is a heavenly service, the laws of nature apparently dictate that anything ordered on ILL will arrive when one has the least possible time to peruse it. Consequently, I scanned a few of the shorter and less fragile titles, and used our departmental camera stand to photograph others. I also photographed some books from our own library, or that I had bought, so that I could have the material readily available on my laptop when I went to Prague.
In Prague, I photograph some books but particularly material from bound journals, most of which are from about 1920-1938. Some of these have very tight bindings, meaning the pages don't want to lie very flat, and some of them have fragile or damaged pages because they were printed on poor quality paper and have been heavily used over the years. I also photograph archival documents.
My next step, usually, is to create a PDF document of the book or journal. This is in order to have one file rather than hundreds, and so that (theoretically) I can set it up for highlighting and other markup. I use Acrobat 6, and the process is 1) Create PDF from multiple files; 2) do any rotations necessary; 3) if the text is fairly straight and in a western European language (i.e. not Czech or Polish), I run the Capture feature. Acrobat's Capture feature is a type of OCR and makes the document searchable and highlightable, but unfortunately version 6 doesn't have support for Czech documents, so I can't do this on most of my texts. Also, which is relevant to Snapter, the Capture feature fails on documents where the lines of text aren't straight enough. (Capture also requires a minimum 300 dpi image, more for small text.)
I perceived, then, a need for something that could correct problems relating to page curvature. After all, if something is merely crooked, I can rotate it in Photoshop, but I'm not aware of any curvature correction in Photoshop (I'm not an advanced user so it might be there, but probably not the kind I seek; correct me if I'm wrong).
Well, I'm sorry to say that my initial experiments with Snapter were disappointing. This shouldn't prevent anyone from trying it, as it's a new product, still being actively tested and improved (barely out of beta), a free trial, and other people's results may be very different than mine. So, go ahead and download it and test it yourself!
I thought, however, that I would show some screen shots of my testing results. They go from the abysmal to the usable.


Figure 1.
book scanning - private notebookUsing your fingers near the spine to hold the pages flat (something I frequently have to do) causes Snapter total meltdown. Click on photo to view exactly where the bounding lines go on this otherwise pretty straightforward photo. Yeah, they're all up above the book.


Figure 2.
book scanning - private notebookHere, the fingers are farther apart so Snapter at least recognizes that it has to do something. Putting lines around the book, however, are not yet on its agenda.


Figure 3.
book scanning - private notebookOne of my main gripes about the version I used (1.03.04) is that I didn't find it very adjustable. OK, so the program initially didn't quite recognize the page borders, but it should be possible to manually adjust. Note the placement and length of the yellow line. It's supposed to be the divider between the two pages. I found that it was somewhat possible to move it right or left if Snapter misplaced it, but for some reason it usually was very short and I couldn't get it to lengthen to the full height of the book. That then messed up the red lines that are supposed to delineate the edges of the pages. Note how on this pretty much nice-and-flat volume the red lines go all over. If this bound journal were any flatter, I wouldn't even bother to try correcting it. As far as I can tell, the problem here must be that the page goes to the edge of the photo at one point, as Snapter requires a dark background all around. Well, when I took the photos, I was trying to maximize page coverage, and avoiding having background. I had no idea I would later need a dark background for Snapter.


Figure 4.
book scanning - private notebook
In this example, Snapter messes up the outline for the left page, which I think (I did these a couple of weeks ago) resulted in it working on only the right page. (Click on the image to see a larger version that shows how the red line cuts off the left-hand page near the gutter.) It is possible to move the red lines a small amount, but what I found curious is that while they have various nodes that ought to be adjustable, I was only able to move two of the nodes--those that represent the centers of the page edges farthest from the spine. Even those could only be moved a small amount. This meant I couldn't correct for most of the problems presented in Snapter's initial attempt.


Figure 5.
book scanning - private notebookIn this instance, the paper I had used to hold the left page in place messes with Snapter's need for a dark background. However, I really don't understand why that affected the rest of the image. You'd expect it to mess only with that edge.


Figure 6.
book scanning - private notebookSome of my photos are single-page, so I did some tests using the Document setting rather than Book. Here, it cropped ok (but so would any image-editing program), but since I could only choose the corners for adjustment rather than additional nodes (still an improvement over the adjustability for the Book setting), the result didn't flatten much. In other words, I could have gotten the same result in quite a few other programs and not had it mysteriously rotate.


Figure 7.
book scanning - private notebookAnother try using the Document setting. The finger on the side didn't cause any real problem, but again the result wasn't much different than cropping with a regular image editor.


Figure 8.
book scanning - private notebookI decided to try doing a two-page spread on the Document rather than Book setting. Actually, I did this because I couldn't get Snapter to start a new project (ie with different settings) without closing the program, so why not experiment? But as one might expect, the results were pretty much just a closer crop and the strange rotation. (Note: the reason I couldn't get it to start a new project seems to have been that I was dragging and dropping into Snapter. The program seems to want you to use a specific folder for the source images, namely the one they have examples in, but my photos were on my second hard drive and it was a real pain constantly choosing that directory.)


Figure 9.
book scanning - private notebookSo... I restarted Snapter and did the same spread using Book. This shows results for the left page--the finger doesn't cause much of a problem, but I couldn't correct the top border, so there's little curl adjustment.


Figure 10.
book scanning - private notebookAnd here's the result for the right page. It doesn't do very much, I think. A bit straighter but still curled.


Figure 11.
book scanning - private notebookHere, I was able to get pretty good results despite the finger in the lower left corner (the outlines are adjusted the best I could), but while I grant that the finger throws off the lower left corner, why should that affect how Snapter deals with the other page corners? And, while this result is not bad, I wouldn't say it's any improvement on the original. The same was pretty much true of the right-hand page... good but not remarkably better.


Figure 12.
book scanning - private notebookHere I got quite good results. Not perfect, but quite good. Had I been able to adjust the boundaries more, the results might have been better. My question with this one is, when the original is this good, and the adjusted version isn't perfect, why would I really bother? Some people would find this amount of adjustment satisfactory. For me, the original was quite readable and I would have wanted the adjusted version mainly so that I could have a nicer looking image for presentations.

I conclude that at this stage, Snapter may be useful for single-sheets or pages, and for books that are very carefully photographed to be well centered against a dark background, with nothing holding the pages in place. I question, however, whether a person really needs to do anything special to most photos that fall in that category. Generally I'd think you could crop and rotate them nicely with most image editors, with less fuss. Other users will have to decide whether their images benefit.
For photos of open books, I believe Snapter has wonderful potential but needs a lot of development in order to be able to handle normal real-life situations. Most books don't open very flat, so the photographer has to do something to make the text reasonably visible, like hold the volume open with one hand or with another book. It seems to me that if the user could adjust all the nodes fully, this would go far to eliminate bad results. Not being a programmer, I don't know how easy it would be to implement that.
Snapter claims that it will do bulk adjustments. I haven't tested this, because I have yet to try a photo that didn't need quite a bit of fiddling with (even those that could be made to produce decent results). Let's face it, even with Irfanview, which can do lots of relatively sophisticated batch edits on photos, I wouldn't be likely to do a batch edit that changed the picture quality, I only do batch edits that do things like change the file name or size or that put a copyright notice on the image (and I do these on copies, not originals, but Snapter does do everything to a copy, not on the original, so that's not an issue here).
I'd also like to see better documentation for Snapter. As far as I could tell, its documentation consists of some basic tips on their website regarding using a dark background and centering the object. I didn't find its supposedly intuitive interface that easy to deal with--it's too dumbed down. Also, it relies a lot on right-clicking, but nothing in the regular menus alerts the user to this. I've used a lot of different programs over the past twenty years but still find Snapter kind of clunky to use since it seems to expect me to read the developers' minds regarding what its different features do or how to accomplish basic tasks. I mean, come on, if I don't understand something in Photoshop, at least I can look it up.
So... that's about all I intend to say about Snapter until the software is further developed, which I very much hope it will be!

Note: A new version of Snapter has come out (July 2007).
posted by Karla at 11:50 AM book scanning - private notebookbook scanning - private notebook
1 Comments: BloggerDr. Zaius said... Holy cow, what the heck are you reading! Deform tools are always pain, regardless of the program. Unfortunately, the best solution is usually to start with a better original. Barring that, Paint Shop Pro has a "deform" and "perspective correction" tools that are sort of not annoying.

Photoshop has great tools too, but I swear that everything is just a little more time consuming in Photoshop.

IrfanView is the best program ever, for what it does. Just a great simple graphics editor. You can also use it to floss your teeth! May 12, 2007 4:52 AM Post a Comment Links to this post: See links to this post
<$BlogBacklinkTitle$>
<$BlogBacklinkSnippet$>
posted by <$BlogBacklinkAuthor$> @ <$BlogBacklinkDateTime$>
if (typeof BL_addOnLoadEvent == 'function') { BL_addOnLoadEvent(function() { BL_writeBacklinks(); }); } function BlogThis() { Q=''; x=document; y=window; if(x.selection) { Q=x.selection.createRange().text; } else if (y.getSelection) { Q=y.getSelection(); } else if (x.getSelection) { Q=x.getSelection(); } popw = y.open('http://www.blogger.com/blog-this.g?t=' + escape(Q) + '&u=' + escape(location.href) + '&n=' + escape(document.title),'bloggerForm', 'scrollbars=no,width=475,height=300,top=175,left=75,status=yes,resizable=yes'); void(0); } Create a Link << Home
Name: Karla Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States View my complete profile

http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Snapter-Uses-Digital-Camera-like-Scanner.htmSnapter Aims to Make Scanning Easy by Karen M. Cheung book scanning - private notebook Add to My Yahoo! book scanning - private notebook


Related Articles
News: Kodak ScanVan to Digitize Photos on the Go · ScanMyPhotos.com Launches; Offers One Price Batch Photo Scanning
SnapterApril 12, 2007 – Want an efficient way to save all your business cards but don't want to spend money on a scanner? Easily copy your friend’s class notes? Import secret legal documents for espionage? A recently launched program called Snapter allows users to copy documents with a digital camera, eliminating the need for a scanner, according to the website. Snapter version 1.02.01, launched this week, can automatically crop the documents to be saved on a PC.

Many digital cameras now offer a “Text” or “Document” mode, alongside the traditional Portrait or Landscape mode. As digital camera manufacturers are getting hip to consumers' desire to easily copy text, Snapter is stepping in tohelp streamline the process ofcroppingthe items.
Click to see Snapter in action
Snapter
Snapter claims the software means,“Goodbye, scanner. Hello digital camera.” for users.Users must take a full view picture of the document against a backdrop, ideallya black, blue, green, or yellow background, according to the company website. Once uploaded to the computer, the PC-enabled Snapter allows the user to choose how the photo is processed. “Document” is best for letters, receipts, and post-in notes. “Card” is optimized for the wide format of a business card, and “Book” corrects the curvature of a printed book. Automatic border detection enables Snapter to trim off the background.

Users can select the image's quality, apply color enhancements such as grayscale, and use ratio size for Legal-sized documents. The images can be saved as JPEG or PDFs.

Snapter version 1.02.01 is compatible with Windows 2000 and higher including Vista. A 15-day trial is available at http://www.atiz.com/snapter.html. The commercial edition of Snapter will retail for $49 when the software becomes available on April 24. Toyen | Prague | Czech | surrealism | blogs | rabbits | cooking and food | travel | music
http://redjar.org/jared/blog/archives/2007/08/26/trying-to-digitize-a-magazine-with-snapter/
Trying to digitize a magazine with Snapter
Sunday August 26th 2007, 10:06 pm
Filed under: Digitization
I tried out the Snapter demo recently. Snapter is an intriguing piece of software that aims to ease the digitization of books, magazines, whiteboard photos, etc. You photograph your page with a digital camera, feed it into Snapter, and boom, you are presented with a beautiful PDF… or that is the idea. In practice, things don’t seem to work so well. I photographed a magazine (about 50 pages). Then ran them through Snapter. The interface and workflow are still a little rough, but the more fundamental problem is the page detection. The program is suppose to detect the edges of the page. Using this information, it can than warp the image to deal with things like page curl, or crooked photos. On most pages, it wasn’t even close, comically so. The page detection algorithm appears to just look for high contrast and forgets that a the edge of a page is almost always a straight line, or close to a straight line. To add insult to injury, the interface gives you the opportunity to correct the page detection by dragging the handles to the true edge, however, when dragging the handles, it would refuse to move where I dragged the cursor. Snapter page detection 1 The above photo is an example of Snapter doing a decent job of page detection thanks to the very simple layout of the pages, with high contrast between the page and the background. It has correctly found the center of the magazine (yellow vertical line). The red line has a minor blip on the lower left, and also didn’t quite find the left side. I imagine, it would do a decent job on a book with no color and no photos or illustrations. Snapter page detection 2 On this set of pages, Snapter fails miserably. These pages are trickier than above, but there are still distinct page edges. Snapter has made comical wavy lines desperately trying to find the edge. Attempts to drag the handles to the true page edges is mostly ignored and just ends in frustration. On top of these issues, Snapter is overpriced (for a consumer application) at $50 and only available for Windows. Here’s hoping for Snapter 3 soon.

http://studenttabletpc.com/2007/09/snapter_ice_competition_giveaway.html
11 September 2007Posted By: Robert
Posted in: Contests/Give-aways snapter-complogo.jpgTo celebrate the launch of Snapter Ice, Atiz Innovation have kindly donated THREE full licenses of Snapter Ice v2.0 (worth $49 each) as competition prizes for the readers of StudentTabletPC. For your chance of winning one just leave a comment attached to this post telling us what your favorite non-Tablet PC gadget is and why. The top 3 judged by the STPC.com team as being the best in terms of innovation and ‘coolness’ will bag the prize. This competition is open to anyone on the planet (regardless of whether you’re a student or not). All entries will be eligible for inclusion up until 12 noon (GMT) of Monday 17th of September 2007 and the winners will be announced soon after this closing date. Good Luck!

24 Responses to “Snapter Ice: Competition Giveaway”

  1. david Says:
    September 11th, 2007 at 5:09 pm Right now it’s my Shure SE 210 earphones I got from Headroom. There great for blocking out distractions without having to crank the music over the background sounds.
  2. Andrew Park Says:
    September 11th, 2007 at 9:14 pm My favourite gadget besides my tablet pc has to be my hiptop. The first phone that could go 6 things. The e-mail when first introduced was as good as crackberry. The data plan for unlimited data was phenominal and nothing could have touched it. The look was hot and people would stop me all the time asking what was that.
  3. Lav Says:
    September 12th, 2007 at 12:46 am I like the docupen. It’s a portable scanner so more time is saved rather than flipping pages and then putting them under the scanner.
  4. Michael Harrison Says:
    September 12th, 2007 at 4:48 am My favorite gadget besides my T4215 tablet is my Coherent 315M laser. It allows me to create some eye-catching holograms and has a nice green glow that any satellite would dread. But have no fear, it never leaves the lab. http://www.dragonseye.com/blog/archives/356-Interferometry-in-Green.html
  5. Ashley Says:
    September 12th, 2007 at 6:41 am One of my cooler gadgets, other than my Tablet PC, and also one of my favourites is my AVerMedia AVerTV Cardbus. It is useful for watching live TV on my tablet, but more than that, I love it because it allows me to use my tablet as a real-time display for my PlayStation 2. This feature alone makes it one of my most useful and coolest gadgets.
  6. Chris Says:
    September 12th, 2007 at 9:55 am One of my favorite ALL-TIME gadgets is my HP Jornada 720 Handheld PC. It is what I took notes on before getting a tablet and it worked fairly well… Basically the great grandfather of the UMPC, these were tiny tiny laptops with flash memory that ran windows CE. I still have mine, and use it occasionally, though my Fujitsu Stylistic tablet takes care of most of my mobile computing needs now. http://the-gadgeteer.com/review/hp_jornada_720_handheld_pc_review
  7. Alex Says:
    September 12th, 2007 at 10:52 am My favorite gadget is my canon pixmia mp830 all-in-one with automatic docum
  8. Dante Says:
    September 12th, 2007 at 1:38 pm I like my PSP. It allows me to have some fun between lectures if they are about 15mins apart or after I have spent hours taking notes on my tablet (Toshiba R15 so the screen isn’t the best). It also allows me to conserve battery power because I don’t need to use my tablet for music and other recreational activities. My PSP is always on me.
  9. Arthur Says:
    September 12th, 2007 at 2:14 pm Gadgets are essential part of my life. I try to implement them in every aspect possible, starting with work, school thru kitchen. Gadgets are good and bad. Bad gadget will waste your time and leave a bad taste after you decide to get rid of it, while the good gadgets keep your satisfaction levels high. My gadget log was long butrecently I shortened it a little and aside of my Hp Tx1000z I have an Iphone ( and I really like it).
  10. Renee Says:
    September 12th, 2007 at 3:57 pm My favorite non-Tablet PC gadget of all time has to be my Leatherman multi-tool. I know it sounds strange, but non-tech gadgets help to save our tech gadgets at times. Having a screwdriver, knife blade, and pliers and saw handy in one package is a lifesaver, and great for performing surgery on gadgetry!
  11. Joe O'Laughlin Says:
    September 14th, 2007 at 8:02 am A $20 Chinese multi-SD card reader lets me grab photos from the camera or wife’s phone without taxing their batteries. Don’t need any stinking proprietary software for the transfers. But I LIKE a 2 pane file utility such as PowerDesk6. The steps of grouping files, drag/dropping, confirming copymove redundantly remind me what stage I’m in in case my attention wanders to the phone or some “person from Porlock” at the door.
  12. Alex Says:
    September 14th, 2007 at 11:20 pm My favorite non tablet gadget is the Kaoss Pad KP3. It has a touchpad that controls two parameters at a time, and is used to put effects into my DJ mixes. It’s more creative and intuitive than using the regular button mashing FX units out there right now and can create some intense sounds.
  13. Coral Millican Says:
    September 15th, 2007 at 3:01 pm My favorite gadget would have to be my iPod, even as cliche as that sounds. I use it for videos, school projects (connected to a TV), showing photos to my friends-I recently went on a trip and took 1500 photos, so showing them off on my iPod was a real time saver and rescued my photo printer!
  14. Anthony Says:
    September 15th, 2007 at 11:20 pm My favorite gadget is my AT&T 8525 (HTC TyTN) Phone/PocketPC. Tunneling a wireless connection when WiFi was down saved my tail one day when I hadn’t preloaded a particular day’s lecture notes. Dial-up through the phone over Bluetooth, and it was done! There are several close seconds, and I have to admit I’m drooling over the Kaoss Pad that Alex mentioned. Give me that and some Serato and I’m ready to hit the stage!
  15. Marco Says:
    September 16th, 2007 at 5:09 am My favorite non tablet gadget is the HTC Touch PDA phone. It’s small and very useful.
  16. Sara Says:
    September 16th, 2007 at 8:37 am Although not electronic, my all-time favorite gadget is a mousetrap. Why? Versatility. Here are 10 ways I use my mousetraps: 1.Chain-reaction fun-making BIG mousetraps, and leaving them near doors, etc. 2. mousetrap towers (my record is 43 tall), 3. Scaring away freshmen (I’m a senior in highschool.) 4. Playing with physics, 5.sturdy paperclip replacement. 6.great ice-breaker. 7. having a whole lot of fun, without really knowing why. 8. clothing (I’ve made a vest of mousetraps once)9. an autonomous mousetrap throwing robot utilizing ultrasonic sensors makes a good guard. 10.catching mice.
  17. Nicolas Says:
    September 16th, 2007 at 8:57 am My favorite would have to be my new iPhone. It’s multi-touch technology makes me drool thinking about how it could be incorporated into future tablet releases - maybe even an Apple one.
  18. Brandon Says:
    September 16th, 2007 at 9:15 am My favorite gadget would have to be the Verizon XV6700. Although no longer on the bleeding edge, it is so useful in my life as a law student. I can call, e-mail, text, google, map, and capture images anywhere I go, all while keeping an up to the second to-do and appointment list. With snapter ice my device would become even more useful and exciting by allowing me to capture information for my research in a quick and efficient manner!
  19. thomas Says:
    September 16th, 2007 at 4:10 pm My favorite gadget, EXCEPT OF MY TABLET PC?!? Ummm… my towel. http://notebook.pege.org/2000/moderner-arbeitsstil.htm
  20. Jonathan Becker Says:
    September 16th, 2007 at 4:42 pm I’d say the Fujitsu Scansnap, which I’ve used to scan in all my books. The simple ability to literally go completely paperless has been a godsend.
  21. Rob Says:
    September 16th, 2007 at 10:55 pm My favorite gadget besides my X41 would have to be my Nokia 6620 cell phone. When I bought this phone 2 years ago, I did so because of one thing - the Symbian OS. My Symbian Series 60 phone allows me great versatility due to the multitude of software out there for it. It can easily manage tasks such as MP3 and video playback. But what software really shines is the minutes manager software that keeps my plan in check, the NES emulator for some old-school fun and even some simplistic but useful programs like Torch(which basically keeps your screen on so you can use your phone as a makeshift light source). And that is only a fraction of what is available. So go Symbian and see what you are missing.
  22. Kit Says:
    September 17th, 2007 at 4:53 am Ok, you said the contest was open in all the planet. I live far from the industrialized world, and a very useful tool for me is the wristwatch beeper pager. Combined with features like e-mail-to-beeper, I am able to get important messages even in remote areas where there is no cell phone coverage. This is useful for information such as getting special warnings on high river levels and other advance-warning notifications. I know that mostly everywhere, pagers have gone the way of the dodo, but with this wrist-clad device, I don’t have to worry about a phone or PDA falling from the belt or a way to charge it in the middle of nowhere. It is way simpler than, but also better and more useful, than other kinds of watches like the MSN watch by Microsoft or USB or MP3 player watches, with a battery life of many months. This one makes life and work out there more efficient, while staying out of the way. [ a website describing it http://www.streettech.com/archives_gadget/beepwear.html ]
  23. Greg Says:
    September 17th, 2007 at 11:42 am I have many favorite gadgets; my Nintendo DS keeps me entertained, my bluetooth mouse lets me use my tablet (motion le1600) as if it were a normal with its keyboard stand without needing to use the “trackpoint” nub (which I dislike immensely), but my most favorite gadget(s) are my flash drives, I have a 1GB one on which I keep all sorts of portable apps, firefox so i have all my bookmarks, antivirus and other diagnostic tools, basically it is my emergency toolkit. I also have a 2GB one that I use for all sorts of file transfers and backup.
  24. Richard Says:
    September 17th, 2007 at 7:18 pm My favorite gadget, besides my tablet (Gateway (CX615) , is my Tablet Pen.I love browsing with the pen, Taking notes in class, annotating PDF, studying with it.













rockyen
rockyen
Latest page update: made by rockyen , Apr 12 2008, 3:25 PM EDT (about this update About This Update rockyen 3 - rockyen

2174 words added
3 images added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.